Report slams UK’s handling of migrant and asylum seeker arrivals | Migration News

The UK has didn’t adequately reply to a surge in arrivals by way of the English Channel, unbiased inspection concludes.

The UK’s dealing with of migrants and asylum seekers who arrive by small boats by way of the English Channel has been unacceptable, ineffective and inefficient, an unbiased inspection has concluded.

The inspection, led by Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration David Neal, targeted on the preliminary processing of individuals at two authorities centres in Dover, southeastern England, between December 2021 and January 2022.

Its report, printed on Thursday after months of delay, concluded the UK authorities’s response to an rising variety of arrivals on its shores for the reason that starting of final yr was “poor, notably when it comes to programs, processes, assets, knowledge assortment and correct file protecting”.

“These migrants crossed the Channel in dire circumstances. Many have been susceptible and in danger, together with youngsters and ladies on their very own, and once they arrived in Dover the way in which they have been handled was unacceptable,” Neal mentioned.

“It’s because the Dwelling Workplace has failed, over the previous three years, to maneuver from a disaster response to having higher programs and procedures in place and treating this as enterprise as standard,” he added, citing the federal government division answerable for dealing with immigration issues.

Perilous crossings

The variety of folks trying harmful sea crossings to the UK has risen sharply for the reason that starting of 2021, forcing the federal government to deal with criticism from some quarters that border controls are too weak, whereas others mentioned that these looking for asylum are being handled inhumanely.

Greater than 28,000 migrants and asylum seekers crossed from mainland Europe to the UK by way of the English Channel final yr, a greater than threefold enhance on the determine for the yr earlier than, and crossings have continued at a tempo this yr.

Many have made the perilous crossing of one of many world’s busiest transport lanes in small dinghies unsafe for the journey.

Highlighting the hazard of the route, in November 2021, 27 folks died whereas trying to achieve the UK in an inflatable dinghy – the deadliest recorded accident of its type within the Channel – triggering a blame game between London and Paris.

The report mentioned the federal government’s insufficient response to the surge in arrivals at Dover had uncovered gaps in safety procedures and left susceptible folks in danger.

“Knowledge, the lifeblood of decision-making, is inexcusably terrible. Gear to hold out safety checks is usually first-generation and unreliable. Biometrics, akin to taking fingerprints and pictures, usually are not all the time recorded,” he mentioned.
“Put merely, if we don’t have a file of individuals coming into the nation, then we have no idea who’s threatened or who’s threatening.”

Controversial Rwanda plan

Responding to the report, the Dwelling Workplace mentioned that adjustments made to its dealing with of arrivals by way of the English Channel meant that “the operation is now basically totally different to that which was inspected” on the two websites.

“The adjustments … have been already in prepare on the time of the inspection and have been particularly aimed toward addressing a number of the core points highlighted on this report,” it mentioned.

“Nonetheless, the Dwelling Workplace acknowledges the observations of truth within the report and accepts all of the suggestions with out demur.”

The report got here because the UK authorities continued to pursue a highly controversial new immigration policy that will see migrants and refugees despatched to Rwanda for processing.

Below an settlement struck in April, London plans to redirect hundreds of people that arrive on its shores with out documentation greater than 4,000 miles (6,4000km) away to the East African nation.

However the plan, which critics have denounced as unethical, unworkable and overly costly, has run into authorized challenges after its opponents instigated a judicial evaluate to problem its lawfulness.

The evaluate is scheduled to start in early September, London’s Excessive Court docket mentioned on Wednesday.